{"id":2297,"date":"2017-01-05T14:47:20","date_gmt":"2017-01-05T22:47:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/?p=2297"},"modified":"2017-11-08T21:41:18","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T19:41:18","slug":"the-institutional-conditions-of-possibility-of-david-harvey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/2017\/01\/05\/the-institutional-conditions-of-possibility-of-david-harvey\/","title":{"rendered":"The institutional conditions of possibility of David Harvey"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a 2015\u00a0essay by David Harvey<\/a> (need I add, “the venerable\u00a0Marxist geographer”?) that\u00a0reflects on the relations between different radical currents in the academic field of geography, he gives an interesting comment on his own conditions of institutional survival:
\n<\/p>\n

Given my situation, in a university that was ruthless about publication, the only way to survive was to publish at a high level. And yes I will here offer a mea culpa<\/em>: I was from the very beginning determined to publish up a storm and I did emphasize to my students and all those around me who would listen that this was one (and perhaps the only) way to keep the door open. It was more than the usual publish or perish. For all those suspected of Marxist or\u00a0anarchist sympathies, it was publish twice as much at a superior level of sophistication or perish. Even then the outcome was touch-and-go, as the long- drawn out battle over Richard Walker\u2019s tenure at Berkeley abundantly illustrated. The Faustian bargain was that we could survive only if we made our radicalism academically respectable and respectability meant a level of academicism that over time made our work less accessible. It became hard to combine a radical pedagogy (of the sort pioneered by Bill Bunge in the Detroit Geographical Expedition) and social activism with academic respectability. Many of my colleagues in the radical movement, those with anarchist leanings in particular, did not care for that choice (for very good reasons) with the result that many of them, sadly, failed or chose not to consolidate academic positions and the space that we had collectively opened was threatened.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This isn’t the first time I’ve heard this kind of comment about the aftermath of the 1960s \u2014 in short, that many radicalized academics washed out of the academy for lack of academic legitimacy.\u00a0That kind of\u00a0details are good counterpoints to the stereotypes about how the American academy is\u00a0populated by “tenured radicals.”<\/p>\n

I would also underline Harvey’s remark that,\u00a0“For all those suspected of Marxist or anarchist sympathies, it was publish twice as much at a superior level of sophistication or perish.” Harvey has always\u00a0come across to me as a particularly\u00a0thorough<\/em> type of scholar \u2014 even to the point of being verbose \u2014 and now I see\u00a0why.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a 2015\u00a0essay by David Harvey (need I add, “the venerable\u00a0Marxist geographer”?) that\u00a0reflects on the relations between different radical currents in the academic field of geography, he gives an interesting comment on his own conditions of institutional survival:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[485,496],"tags":[764,765,763],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2297"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2297"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2297\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2511,"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2297\/revisions\/2511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/decasia.org\/academic_culture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}