Comments on: Style, bad prose, and Corey Robin’s theory of public intellectuals https://decasia.org/academic_culture/2016/07/01/style-and-corey-robin-on-public-intellectuals/ critical anthropology of academic culture Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:37:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.1 By: eli https://decasia.org/academic_culture/2016/07/01/style-and-corey-robin-on-public-intellectuals/#comment-11960 Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:37:17 +0000 http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=2203#comment-11960 In reply to Paul Ryer.

Hi Paul, yep, Agamben seems like a good example to me as well (though I don’t know a lot about his life and career to be honest). It seems to me in any event that most reasonable critical theorists understand that their relationship to a public is a matter of historical and institutional conjunctures that are outside their control. I don’t really feel that there is any disrespect involved in pointing that out (though it also occurs to me that only a deeply hierarchical intellectual culture would tell us that we MUST respect famous theorists as such…).

]]>
By: Paul Ryer https://decasia.org/academic_culture/2016/07/01/style-and-corey-robin-on-public-intellectuals/#comment-11958 Sun, 10 Jul 2016 23:07:10 +0000 http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=2203#comment-11958 Fascinating, thanks for posting this, Eli. Wouldn’t Agamben be another example of the importance of context? I.e., his work on camps surely found such a receptive audience because of the moment. That is, with Gitmo’s Camp X-ray and its ilk, there was a sharply increased need to think about such spaces, globally, and in a sense, Agamben was in the right place at the right time. Not to disrespect his work, but to point out the relevance of temporal, external, and contextual factors to theory-in-itself.

]]>
By: Mike Bishop https://decasia.org/academic_culture/2016/07/01/style-and-corey-robin-on-public-intellectuals/#comment-11950 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 19:15:19 +0000 http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=2203#comment-11950 Great post!

]]>