So much for meta-reflections on your comment. A couple of more specific questions about your proposal also come to my mind:
1) What does “emancipation” mean? I’m not sure this is something we can take for granted.
2) Can you say more about why collective re-appropriation “can arise ONLY from the direct action of the primary producers, organized in a distinct mass party-movement”? Or why this “must” be pursued? I’m not really a determinist about political strategy; it seems to me that for any given political goal there are generally multiple ways of getting there, and it’s more a matter of weighing different options than of embracing THE one and only method. Which is why activists generally need to deliberate about strategy. The burden of proof is on you, it seems to me, to show that the “mass party-movement” is the only possible way forward. You know what I mean?

take care, Eli

Considering, that against this combined power of the elite classes the primary producers or precariat cannot unite and act for itself except by constituting itself into a mass party-movement, distinct from, and opposed to, all old parties and movements, that this constitution of the precariat into a mass party-movement is indispensable in order to ensure the emancipation of its labour power,

That such labour power can be emancipated only when, at minimum, the precariat is in collective possession of all means of societal production, all commons, etc., that there are only two forms under which all means of societal production, all commons, etc. can belong to them or return to community:

1) The individual form which has never existed in a general state and which is increasingly eliminated by industrial progress;
2) The collective form the material and intellectual elements of which are constituted by the very development of capitalist society;

Considering,

That again this collective re-appropriation, or political and economic expropriation of the elite classes, can arise only from the direct action of the primary producers or precariat, organized in a distinct mass party-movement;

Such permanent organization must be pursued by all the means the precariat has at its disposal.

@Ana, I share your skepticism about the usefulness of “crisis” talk, which always seems to me partly performative and theatrical… But can you say more about how you see the relation between precarity (which is at once a social reality and a discursive construct) and crisis discourse? Haven’t thought about that before.

http://www.google.com/search?q=precariate

I guess if one were seriously going to pursue a project of this sort — based on graphing various keywords over time — one would have to think about possible other semi-synonyms for “intellectual proletariat” that might be points of comparison. “Unemployed elites,” something of that sort…

Eli