Also, Rex, you say this is among the the most famous – hence important? – pieces in American anthro — are you serious? It’s very fun to read, but the analysis of ‘French culture’ is, to be more frank than I initially was in the post, lazy and pretty classist to boot, and I’m not sure it’s the best theoretical contribution to culture theory I’ve seen either. I mean, ‘spurious cultures’ are to be judged as such on the basis of the insufficiency of their structure of means-ends relations? That requires a better argument than I see in this piece.
OK, but I’ll stop being defensive because I was wrong. I can’t say I’m entirely above that impulse.
]]>Honestly what are they teaching you people these days? This is one of the most famous pieces in the canon of American anthropology. Go give your systems prof hell for not making you read this earlier (and getting the attribution right).
Kids these days grumble grumble…
]]>