<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion at Paris-8, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2010/05/religion-at-paris-8-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2010/05/religion-at-paris-8-part-1/</link>
	<description>critical anthropology of academic culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bishop</title>
		<link>http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2010/05/religion-at-paris-8-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=1438#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/nerds-are-nuts.php claims that there is an intersection in the personality profiles of scientists/engineers and religious fundamentalists</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/nerds-are-nuts.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/nerds-are-nuts.php</a> claims that there is an intersection in the personality profiles of scientists/engineers and religious fundamentalists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: decasia: critique of academic culture &#187; Religion at Paris-8, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2010/05/religion-at-paris-8-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2407</link>
		<dc:creator>decasia: critique of academic culture &#187; Religion at Paris-8, Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=1438#comment-2407</guid>
		<description>[...] see that Mike has already inquired as to the methodology of the report on student religion that I began posting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see that Mike has already inquired as to the methodology of the report on student religion that I began posting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bishop</title>
		<link>http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2010/05/religion-at-paris-8-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=1438#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff.   Minor point: we&#039;d ideally like to know how the data was collected... perhaps just accosting people on campus?  if instead it was email or something, what was the response rate?  Any reason to believe certain populations were over or under counted?

I think I remember hearing that U.S. humanities professors are less religious than many scientific or business disciplines.  There are a lot of potential explanations for this, it&#039;d be interesting to try to tease them out.  The ones you suggest are good candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff.   Minor point: we&#8217;d ideally like to know how the data was collected&#8230; perhaps just accosting people on campus?  if instead it was email or something, what was the response rate?  Any reason to believe certain populations were over or under counted?</p>
<p>I think I remember hearing that U.S. humanities professors are less religious than many scientific or business disciplines.  There are a lot of potential explanations for this, it&#8217;d be interesting to try to tease them out.  The ones you suggest are good candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

