<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universities seen through their weeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2008/12/universities-seen-through-their-weeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2008/12/universities-seen-through-their-weeds/</link>
	<description>critical anthropology of academic culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heatrose</title>
		<link>http://decasia.org/academic_culture/2008/12/universities-seen-through-their-weeds/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>heatrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decasia.org/academic_culture/?p=235#comment-391</guid>
		<description>backwards, backwards!

are the weeds blurry or is it the university? is it roofs through weeds or do weeds pierce roofs, shred fences? are they necessarily &quot;aesthetic accidents&quot;, or are they only such to those who think they are groundskeepers? 

if a university is not a still life is it not because weeds still sprout up, despite the plantings of fashionable flora that the university grooms and then replaces far too frequently, with each sub-season they can come up with? --are you sure you are focusing on the university and not its weeds? maybe you are-- are you sure you want to be? 

in either case, you could probably at least create a good picture by reversing the focus.  you could also sound a lot like virginia woolf if your sentences were just a little bit longer and involved more dashes (dashery?!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>backwards, backwards!</p>
<p>are the weeds blurry or is it the university? is it roofs through weeds or do weeds pierce roofs, shred fences? are they necessarily &#8220;aesthetic accidents&#8221;, or are they only such to those who think they are groundskeepers? </p>
<p>if a university is not a still life is it not because weeds still sprout up, despite the plantings of fashionable flora that the university grooms and then replaces far too frequently, with each sub-season they can come up with? &#8211;are you sure you are focusing on the university and not its weeds? maybe you are&#8211; are you sure you want to be? </p>
<p>in either case, you could probably at least create a good picture by reversing the focus.  you could also sound a lot like virginia woolf if your sentences were just a little bit longer and involved more dashes (dashery?!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

